Agena Company Logo
leftl
Latest Publication
Free Download
You can download a free evaluation
of AgenaRisk Desktop, which contains the complete functionality,
here.
AgenaRisk users include:
You are here: Home » Case Studies » Managing risk associated with inserting new technology and systems
Managing risk associated with inserting new technology and systems
Problem
- Whenever new technology or systems are implemented
into some existing system there can be potentially negative impacts as
well as the expected rewards
- The need to predict more accurately the risk/reward
trade-off is especially critical where an existing system that is
critical to an organisation's well being could be adversely affected by
the change
- One of our customers, a major Canadian bank's IT
Department, has to consider many proposals for new functionality and
systems each year. The problem was that many such projects can have a
negative impact on existing core IT systems. For example, previously
working business critical functions can be lost for unacceptably long
periods due to the insertion of some new (but apparently unrelated)
functionality
- The challenge was to be able to identify which
proposed new functionality represented the most risk (in terms of
potential negative impact) on its existing core IT systems
- Predicting such risks and reward before the process of
technology insertion starts is extremely difficult because of the need
to combine minimal objective data with a lot of expert judgement
Solution
- For the bank we developed a risk map and associated risk table that is used as a filter for all new projects and proposals
- Specifically, a risk assessor answers some basic questions
about the new project in the risk table and the risk map calculates the
"yes/no" probability of negative impact
- If the probability of no is sufficiently low the project can proceed. Otherwise further clarification and checks are needed
Benefits
- Reduced problems with existing core IT infrastructure due
to the fact that "risky" projects are more likely to be filtered out
early (and their risks mitigated if they do eventually proceed)
- Rational, auditable justification for filtering decisions.
It is fully explained by the risk map structure and the results for
each project proposal
- Minimal effort to use. Project managers and/or risk
assessors answer a set of simple questions about each project proposal
and then press a button to get the full results. Answers can be
supplied directly via the intranet