Faster, cheaper, more accurate method for calculating the most reliable vehicle design
Mrs G Hardy, QinetiQ
Problem
- Determining which vehicle to choose, from competing tenders, to meet a new Ministry of Defence (MOD) requirement is difficult, time consuming and error prone
- Traditional solutions used by QinetiQ involved a combination of:
- Extensive track-testing of prototypes supplied by competing manufacturers
- Modeling based on analyzing design specs and using "sum-of-parts" reliability predictions
- This process was hugely expensive and generally led to unsatisfactory predictions because there was no means of combining subjective judgements about likely design and manufacturing process quality
Solution
- AgenaRisk was used to predict vehicle reliability accurately based on information about the architecture and design process
- The risk map was built "dynamically" based on the particular subsystem architecture of a given vehicle spec. For each vehicle, any known information about the subsystem reliability was used. This was combined with information about the particular manufacturer and their design and manufacturing processes
- For each proposed vehicle a prediction of reliability was output from AgenaRisk along with all supporting reports providing a full audit trail of assumptions
Benefits
- AgenaRisk saves time and money because accurate predictions are achieved without the need for track testing
- Predictions made by AgenaRisk are more accurate because QinetiQ can combine subjective data about the process and manufacturer with hard data about component reliability
- AgenaRisk helps identify process improvement opportunities and improve vehicle reliability
- AgenaRisk reduces whole life costs


